vulturetrades

Based on 40 decided calls with 98% coverage (data through 2026-07-23), the verified book earns an ANTE Score of 22 — Unproven. Fourteen wins against 26 losses is a 35% strike rate, and the magnitudes cut the wrong way: winners average +87% while losers average -96%, most simply expiring worthless. Winners don't pay for losers. Every call also lands in one tight mid-April week on weekly options, so the sample is concentrated as well as small — read it as a snapshot, not a settled track record.

The church is breakout-momentum on short-dated calls: a ticker, strike, expiry and entry price fired as a 'High Confidence 🚨' alert. Followers receive an exact contract to buy in real time — specific, actionable, easy to mirror. What's missing is the why. Rationale rarely exceeds 'this looks A+' or 'can 5-10x'; charts and data are scarce, and conviction supplies the rest. Direction is imperative rather than conditional — you're handed the trade, not the reasoning you'd need to size or defend it yourself.

This is the card that matters most here. Zero percent of calls state a stop, and the losers show it: an average -96% means most weeklies expired worthless, larger and more frequent than the +87% winners. Position language is 'rolling these higher' and 'roll to next weeks' — pushing exposure forward rather than cutting. And the losers stay quiet: the corpus reads wall-to-wall green while the verified book is 26-of-40 red. Followed at equal size, that asymmetry erodes capital faster than the winners rebuild it.

Meet the Vulture 🦅: relentlessly upbeat, self-crowned 'the best day trader on X,' up at 6am and never short of a victory lap — 'Are you not entertained?' The corpus skews heavily to gain-screenshots and hype ('handed you 5,200%+ gains') over teaching or losses. Notably, he refuses paid funnels outright: 'No paywall service,' 'I will never charge a penny.' The monetisation is attention itself — a free X group, a recurring '$100-to-$10,000 challenge,' and steady engagement bait ('comment to be added').

There's a stated intent to teach — 'Show entries, show my thought process, show how I manage risk' — and to his credit he leaves the exit to you: taking profit, he says, is on you. But in practice the feed instructs little. You learn which contract he bought, not how to find or size it, and never why a loser lost, because losers aren't posted. The community tone is broadcast, not conversation: challenges, notification nags, and no crediting of other traders' work.

You'll like this if you actively trade weekly options, want fast real-time alerts with exact strikes and entries, and bring your own risk management and exit discipline — the entries are specific and the energy is infectious. Skip it if you need a documented thesis, stated stops, honest drawdowns, or a horizon longer than a few days. A 9-to-5er can't realistically act on intraday 'sniper entries,' and equal-sizing a 35%-hit, -96%-loser book is punishing without tight, self-imposed rules.