srxtrades

Fifty decided calls, 23 wins against 27 losses, ANTE Score 33 in the Unproven band with a 33–60 interval. Average win +28.7%, average loss -52.2%, worst -99.8% — the losers are nearly twice the winners, so a sub-50% hit rate compounds against him. Directional return is -2.8% across 55 calls. Coverage is 60%, flagged partial, and corroboration returns contradicted: the calls we can only infer underperform the ones he states.

The process is coherent and stated plainly: tight weekly and daily bases, entries off the 21 and 50 EMA, volume drying up before the move, continuation over catching tops. Fifty of 85 calls are stock and 34 are options. Sixty-four percent carry a target. Charts accompany most setups with the level marked. The method is teachable and he teaches it — the gap is between the method and the outcomes recorded.

Two percent of calls state a stop, and none state both a target and a stop. That matters more here than elsewhere because the option positions can go to zero: the worst decided call landed at -99.8%, and ten settled by expiry rather than at a level. A style built on tight bases implies a tight invalidation, but the invalidation is not published, so a follower reconstructs it themselves.

Of 1,165 tweets, 113 are educational and 85 are charts — the largest categories, which is unusual and to his credit. Personal posts lean on the arc: a first five-figure month, a $1,000 account turned into $100,000 and handed back. Promotion is modest at 28 posts but high-ticket: a three-day mastermind at a private house in Los Angeles, DMs for details, a free Sunday livestream.

This is the strongest part of the feed. He names his sources — volatility contraction from Minervini — explains why continuation beats top-picking, and describes the conditions that precede big moves rather than just pointing at one. A beginner would learn a real framework here. He is gracious about other traders and credits the people whose work he uses.

You'll like this if you want to understand base-and-breakout trading from someone who explains it well and posts his charts. You'll want to be careful if you plan to follow the calls themselves: the verified slice is Unproven, the losses run larger than the wins, and the corroboration check is contradicted. The teaching and the track record deserve to be judged separately.